Your browser does not currently support JavaScript.

If your are using Netscape 2 or later then you can enable JavaScript.

Version 2 or 3: Choose Options|Network Preferences, choose the Languages tab, click Enable Javascript and then click OK.

Version 4: Choose Edit|Preferences|Advanced, click Enable JavaScript and then click OK.


With Internet Explorer 5: Go to Tools Menu|Internet Options, Security Tab and click on the Custom Level. Then select disable active scripting under the scripting section.

Obama's Idea of A Solution To High Gas Prices

Barack Obama demonstrates (again) poor judgement and a lack of understanding about the critically important energy issues facing America (and Colorado). Listen to Barack Obama explaining how we can get millions of extra barrels of oil a day. HOW? We can pull it out of thin air - literally:



Here is Obama's ridiculous quote:
"There are things you can do individually, though, to save energy. Making sure your tires are properly inflated - simple thing. But we could save all the oil that they're talking about getting off drilling - if everybody was just inflating their tires? And getting regular tune-ups? You'd actually save just as much!"

"Save just as much"??? Factually this is wrong. Senator McCain, on the other hand, supports increasing our oil supply to address the high price of energy. Senator McCain is applying sound economic principles to address this problem; Obama has a talking point that has no basis in fact. These kinds of comments illustrate that Obama lacks sound judgement and is clearly not ready to lead.

For example, the Green River oil shale formation could produce at least 800 billion barrels of oil alone, enough for over 100 years at our current rate of consumption (20 million barrels per day). Would inflating our tires eliminate every single drop of oil we use? Of course not! Nor would it save any significant amount at all. Tire inflation could improve gas mileage by about 3%, which would relate to about 600,000 barrels of oil a day at the most absurdly optimistic extrapolation.

More Barack Obama Information

More information about Barack Obama:

Obama Opposes Offshore Drilling To Increase American Energy Independence:

Obama Opposes Lifting The Ban On Offshore Drilling. Obama: "The politics may have changed, but the facts haven't. The accuracy of Sen. McCain's original position has not changed: Offshore drilling would not lower gas prices today, it would not lower gas prices next year and it would not lower gas prices five years from now." (Sen. Barack Obama, Remarks At Press Availability, Jacksonville, FL, 6/20/08)

  • Obama Called Offshore Drilling A "Scheme." Obama: "Now the latest scheme is well, we're going to drill offshore." (Sen. Barack Obama, Remarks At Campaign Event, Springfield, MO, 7/30/08)

OBAMA'S LATEST SOLUTION TO HIGH GAS PRICES: WINDFALL PROFITS TAX

Today, Obama Proposed Imposing A Windfall Profits Tax As A Solution To High Gas Prices:

Obama: "That is why I am proposing that we pay for this rebate by taxing the windfall profits of oil companies so we can use some of their record profits to help families pay record prices." (Mark Halperin, "Senator Barack Obama Announces Emergency Economic Plan," Time's "The Page" Blog, thepage.time.com, 8/1/08)

But History Has Shown That A Windfall Profits Tax Is Bad Policy: It Reduces Domestic Oil Production, Increases U.S. Dependence On Foreign Oil, And Harms Consumers With Increased Energy Costs:

The Non-Partisan Congressional Research Service Found That The Windfall Profits Tax Reduced Domestic Oil Production And Increased Our Dependence On Foreign Oil By As Much As 13 Percent. "From 1980 to 1988, the WPT may have reduced domestic oil production anywhere from 1.2% to 8.0% (320 to 1,269 million barrels). Dependence on imported oil grew from between 3% and 13%." (Salvatore Lazzari, "The Crude Oil Windfall Profit Tax Of The 1980s: Implications For Current Energy Policy," Congressional Research Service, 3/9/06)

  • The Windfall Profits Tax Was "An Extremely Complicated Tax To Comply With And To Administer." "The oil industry maintained all along that the WPT was an extremely complicated tax to comply with and to administer. The IRS and the General Accounting Office (GAO, now the Government Accountability Office) both agreed with the industry's claim, and the eight-year experience with the tax also tended to support this." (Salvatore Lazzari, "The Crude Oil Windfall Profit Tax Of The 1980s: Implications For Current Energy Policy," Congressional Research Service, 3/9/06)

The Wall Street Journal: The Windfall Profits Tax Reduced Domestic Oil Production, Increased U.S. Dependence On Foreign Oil, And Increased Prices At The Pump. "The last time Congress imposed a form of the windfall tax was the final gloomy days of Jimmy Carter, and the result was: a substantial reduction in domestic oil production (about 5%), thus raising the price of gas at the pump; and a 10% increase in U.S. reliance on foreign oil. A windfall profits tax is the ultimate act of economic masochism because it taxes only domestic production, while imports and foreign oil subsidiaries bear almost none of the cost." ( Editorial, "Windfall Accounting Tax," The Wall Street Journal, 11/30/05)

Obama Now Wants To Tax The Oil Companies He Voted To Give Billions In Tax Breaks And Subsidies:

The 2005 Energy Bill Included $2.8 Billion In Subsidies For Oil And Natural Gas Production. "The conference agreement provides for $14.6 billion in tax breaks and credits between 2005 and 2015, including: -- $2.8 billion for fossil fuel production..." (Toni Johnson, "CQ Bill Analysis: HR 6," Congressional Quarterly's "CQ Bill Analysis," www.cq.com, Accessed 7/14/08)

Obama Voted For The 2005 Energy Bill. (H.R. 6, CQ Vote #213: Adopted 74-26: R 49-6; D 25-19; I 0-1, 7/29/05, Obama Voted Yea)

John McCain Criticized The 2005 Energy Bill's "Handouts To Big Business And Oil Companies," Calling Them Irresponsible. McCain: "This bill does little to address the immediate energy crisis we face in this country. The handouts to big business and oil companies are irresponsible and will be disastrous for people of Arizona. I cannot in good conscience, vote to pass legislation that does not adequately address issues related to energy efficiency, security, and energy independence." (Sen. John McCain, "McCain, Kyl Say No To Flawed Energy Bill," Press Release, 6/28/05)

  • McCain Voted Against The 2005 Energy Bill. (H.R. 6, CQ Vote #213: Adopted 74-26: R 49-6; D 25-19; I 0-1, 7/29/05, McCain Voted Nay)